Corruption & Cover up in the Federal Courts in Massachusetts Files with Evidence and the way to monitor any

action you may have in the federal court system follows this request to Americans who are tired of supporting the corrupt third branch of our government
USDC - Case NO. 10 CA 11343 GAO USCA1 - Case NO. 11-1668 (Writ) Case NO. 11-2292 (Appeal)

MASSACHUSETTS FEDERAL COURTS MANAGED BY CROOKS AND LIARS

Multiple documented complaints indicate that corruption in the US Courts is a national crisis!

TAX PAYER SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVANTS WORKING IN THE US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT STOLE THIS DISABLED AMERICANS FILING FEE, NOT ONCE, BUT TWICE AND FALSIFIED DOCUMENTS TO BE TRUE AND VALID COURT DOCUMENTS. THE COURT OF APPEALS CORRUPT STAFF FOLLOWED THE SAME ILLEGAL ACTS COMMITTED BY TAX PAYER SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVANTS WHO WORK IN THE US DISTRICT COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ALL OF THESE TAX PAYER SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVANTS ARE COLLUDING WITH CORRUPT JACKSON LEWIS ATTORNEYS AND THE LAW FIRM APPEARS TO BE A DOMESTIC TERRORIST CELL THAT HAS BEEN GIVEN FREE REIN TO DELEGITIMIZE OUR THIRD BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT; IT APPEARS THE LAW FIRM ALSO HAS FREE REIN TO COMMIT FEDERAL LAW VIOLATIONS IN REPRESENTING THEIR CORPORATE CLIENTS BEFORE AGENCIES UNDER THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH SUCH AS THE EEOC WHICH ALSO EMPLOYS CORRUPT TAX SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVANTS. Quotes from our leaders after former house speaker was convicted of Dishonest Service Fraud
Chief Judge Wolf The judge said DiMasi inherited a responsibility to serve in office honorably and should have been aware that his actions were breaking the law,.. Which person is more dangerous in our country, Wolf asked, someone who is doing what everyone he knows does, selling crack on a corner, or people who are undermining our democracy by successfully conspiring to sell their public office? Carmen Ortiz Federal AG

You heard what Judge Wolf said inside, that somehow its striking that elected officials think their good works (make the case) that a little corruption is OK. Its not OK, she said. I am hoping by these prosecutions, the sentences that have been given out, that all elected officials not just on Beacon Hill, but in the state of Massachusetts will realize that these are serious crimes.

WANTED
PANEL OF HONEST US DISTRICT AND CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES WHO DISTAIN PURPOSEFUL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT DEPRIVATION, DISHONEST PUBLIC SERVANTS AND ATTORNEYS WHO HAVE ABANDONED THE PRINCIPLES OF THEIR PROFESSION. DEAR HONORABLE JUDGES PLEASE FILE A DECLARATION TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT THAT DESCRIBES THE DETERIORATION OF RULE OF LAW AND CORRUPTION THAT IS OCCURRING IN OUR US COURTS AND REQUEST IMMEDIATE ACTION TO FACILITATE CORRECTION ---I wont hold my breath waiting for you to act and the fact that my perception that holding my breath while I await action by honest judges would surely kill me is SHAMEFUL!!!!! REMINDER---THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND I SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE MAKING THIS REQUEST!!!!

QUESTION TO THE TAX PAYERS OF AMERICA!!

DO YOU WANT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING YOUR TAX DOLLARS DEFENDING THESE CORRUPT PEOPLE IN A CIVIL SUIT IN ANOTHER CIRCUIT OR DO YOU WANT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO PUT ALL THESE CORRUPT PUBLIC SERVANTS AND CORRUPT LAWYERS BEFORE A GRAND JURY TO ACHIEVE INDICTMENT AND SUBSEQUENT JUSTICE?

I SUGGEST YOU WRITE THE FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS AND EXPRESS YOUR THOUGHTS!!!
MULTIPLE DEMANDS MADE BY THE PEOPLE FOR GRAND JURY HEARINGS COULD BE THE START TO HALTING CORRUPTION IN THE MASSACHUSETTS FEDERAL JUDICIARY. (Multiple

demands may break through the corruption at the DOJ AND EEOC) As you will see a few DOJ and EEOC employees also need a serious sit down in front of a Grand Jury!!!

MassachusettsYOU THE PEOPLE NEED TO CLEAN UP YOUR STATETHE CORRUPT

IN YOUR STATE ONLY BATHE EACH OTHER IN MORE CORRUPTION AND NO ONE CAN GET CLEAN WHEN CONTINUALLY WASHING WITH DIRTY WATER! They cleaned up the Charles now lets work on cleaning up the government because no one is in love with the government employees saturated in dirty water currently in charge! The State of Massachusetts appears to be one huge criminal enterprise that steers money to corrupt attorneys.

This woman needs mail: Carmen Milagros Ortiz United States Attorney U.S. Department of Justice John J. Moakley United States Courthouse 1 Courthouse Way - Suite 9200 Boston, MA 02210
The alleged criminals have formed a conspiracy to ensure that a Disabled American never gets her day in court and are depriving a Disabled American of multiple constitutional rights. They are falsely signing off court documents and representing them to be true and valid documents of the court. They have now, twice, taken the filing fee from a Disabled American over at the US Court of Appeals yet provided no legitimate court action. The Circuit Executive Office of the First Circuit is run by crooks and liars which leaves you with no legitimate body to file a grievance regarding the other crooks and liars. REMEMBER FOLKS YOU PAY THESE CORRUPT PUBLIC SERVANTS.

The alleged criminal activity by the players varies; however, all are alleged to be in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 Conspiracy against rights and dishonest service fraud. Margaret Carter, Clerk USCA1 Dishonest service fraud. Ms. Carter is not alleged,
at this time, to be directly involved in the instant matter however it is staff under her charge

that have blocked my Extraordinary Writ from the Judges; they refuse to put me through to Ms. Carter when I call the court and communication by any other means has proven futile as the staff of both these courts block the mail and any other attempt of communication with an honest authority (verification that an honest authority does in fact exist has not been established).

Update

1/21/2012 Carter was Emailed on 1/3/2012- she took no action to help me or halt

federal crimes against me by her court staff. After I informed her that my appeal, which arose after my action in the US District Court had been illegally dismissed by falsely accusing and finding me in contempt, was also dismissed on 12/27/2011 via email, Carter took absolutely no corrective action. Carter is alleged to be aiding and abetting her alleged criminal staff. Carter was informed that my action in her court was under usurpation and I requested that she ensure my case went before a judge. Carter responded with a form return email. The following message came in my email and was forwarded by Carter to the case manager who subsequently entered on 1/12/2012 the bogus Judgment that denied my motion to vacate the VOID, not voidable, but VOID order that dismissed my appeal with absolutely zero de novo review and allowed corrupt Jackson Lewis attorneys to continue with their bogus filings with the court and well documented fraud upon the court.
Dear Ms. McGarry: Any correspondence with the Clerk must be by regular mail or, if you are an ECF filer, by electronic filing. Any further emails to the Clerk will be disregarded. Margaret Carter, Clerk US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit John Joseph Moakley U.S. Courthouse 1 Courthouse Way - - Suite 2500 Boston, MA 02210

I then entered a letter and motion into the ECF system addressed to Carter and Chief Judge Lynch on 1/12/2012 which has not received any response other than a response by the corrupt attorneys stating I should be blocked from further use of the electronic filing system and have all of my motion denied which included providing me with Mandates regarding the bogus judgments and engagement of the advisory committee regarding more than apparent intrinsic corruption. I called the case manager and left a voice message reminding him that fraudulently representing court documents to be true judicial decisions without the approval of a judge is considered per the case law to be identity theft which carries a two year mandatory sentence. As of this writing there has been no response from the court to the corrupt attorneys latest bogus filing.

Jane Doeinitials (SBT) UPDATE 5/25/2012 SBT IDENTIFIEDapparently a John Doe

Stephen Bryce Turnerlaw clerk first circuit

USCA1altered court records to reflect a Judicial Panel that never happenedsee link to Denied without an Opinion The Pacer site no longer brought up my case if I enter any parties name with an all courts search or specifically the first circuit appeals court; the case could only be retrieved by entering the case number with no party (this was a new development as of September 21st). Through my communications with PACER, I learned that the case was altered so that the party search would complete a successful search only if [In Re: McGarry] was entered; no one would initiate a search by placing the aforementioned in the party box where the instructions clearly state last name, first name. No search under any of the defendants names was successful. My WRIT was never before any Judge and I have been stating this based on the fact that it would be strange to have Chief Judge Lynchs name on a May 18th bogus judicial misconduct order and then on a panel that denied a WRIT which by law required an answerer in 72 hours with a stay to the maximum of five days; if denied, by law, the judgment had to have an opinion. It was answered ten days after filed and DENIED without an opinion and there was never a judicial panel noted on the docket. Filing anything in the federal court system of Massachusetts is an act in futility and I dont have the money to play this dirty game. I am quite sure that I am not the first. This criminal behavior by staff in the judiciary in collusion with corrupt attorneys has been going on in Massachusetts for years; if there is any question regarding the aforementioned just ask the Chalupowski couple (Google the name) or maybe we should be asking SBT. Senior Judge Levin H. Campbell - Law Clerk Susannah Barton Tobin Apparently Susannah Barton Tobin, also, teaches at Harvard; SBT frequently enters corrections to the language of opinions on the case dockets Whether the Appeals Court has another clerk with the initials SBT has not been validated 2011 University of Maine School of Law Maine Law Review Recently published an article by Judge Cambell that included the following bracketed information: [NAME: The Honorable Levin Campbell* BIO: * Senior Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. For their helpful comments after reading a draft, I thank Susannah Barton Tobin and Professor Frank E. A. Sander. For his excellent research assistance, I thank Josh Podoll.]

I spoke with a Clerk at USCA1 who claimed his name was Daniel Toomie (I am unsure of the correct spelling or if this is a real name since everyone I have had contact with at the 1 st circuit appears to be a liar). The clerk denied knowing a Susannah Barton Tobin and denied knowing who in the court makes docket entries with the initials SBT. He also denied that my docket was illegally altered and foolishly stated that the June 13th date was entered in July. I told him he was full of it and that in no way or fashion was slipping a June 13th date onto the docket legal and that I knew for a fact that the date was slipped in after the corrupt attorney Brian Childs who had not appeared in the case filed a notice of appearance on June 28th which was eight days after the June 20th judgment that denied my Writ without an opinion. September 2011, I discovered the Docket to show Childs June 28th appearance and the June 13th docket text.

Ms. Tobin now that SBT, Stephen Bryce Turner ADMINISTRATIVE LAW CLERK FOR THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, has been identified, I offer my sincere regret that your name had to get dragged into this mess. Perhaps the outcome will be that you will enforce to your students that purposeful perversion of law, altering of court records and identity theft of a judge in order to obstruct justice in any way shape or form is a CRIMINAL OFFENSE!!!

Above is how the docket looked on June 20, 2011.

Above is how the docket looked on September 22, 2011.

I subsequently found the following when I did a direct search on the 1 st circuit PACER site. These crooks and liars denied my motion to vacate void orders and remand the case to the US District court even with the following evidence attached to the motion.

Note 6/13/2011 under Representation End and Childs name entered twice on the docket.

Daniel Toomie- Aiding and abetting dishonest service fraud and the obstruction of
justice.

George Kretas- USCA1 case manager CASE NO. 11-1668 - obstruction of justice,
conspiracy to violate rights, & racketeering- if a sworn public servant ->perjury -he filed the DENIED without an opinion decision on my Extraordinary Writ that never saw a judge. George was asked several times why the decision was taking so long and why had no panel yet been assigned prior to the decision; no acceptable answer came forth. George was also confronted after the bogus decision and informed that I was well aware that my Writ never saw a judge. His response was those types of documents always get that response and he continued with his dishonesty stating the Writ went before a panel of judges. George entered the order and judgment that dismissed my appeal; he is not the case manager for the appeal. Interestingly the day before my appeal was dismissed his name came up on my Scribd site as a search term entered in Google which brought up this document.

Adam Sparrow - USCA1 case manager CASE NO. 11-2292 - obstruction of justice,
conspiracy to violate rights, & racketeering. If a sworn public servant ->perjury -he filed the DENIED motion to vacate void orders.

Catherine Gawlik- USDC INTAKE/CUSTOMER SERVICE Supervisor initiated the

pretense litigation placing the Complaint filed August 2, 2010 on Judge OTooles docket eight days after filed.

Barbara Morse

US District Court of Massachusetts Pro Se Staff Attorney forgery and

identity theft Dkt. # 20, 53, 57 & 61 and most likely more with Simones computer. The letter she sent me with the initiating docket clearly indicates they had their plan for pretense litigation in action and it is filed in the case record. She also claimed that she copied and mailed the exhibit courtesy copy in which key exhibit were missing and interfered with service of process. Racketeering, dishonest service fraud, mail fraud, obstruction of justice, conspiracy to violate rights, identity theft and extortion.

Paul Lyness

USDC Deputy Clerk to Judge OToole perjury-he filed document Dkt. #101

the document is a false document intended to represent a true court record and he filed under oath certifying the document. Racketeering, dishonest service fraud, obstruction of justice, conspiracy to violate rights and extortion. He also needs to learn to answer the phone stating his namehe tends to seek out who is on the other end of the phone before he states his name which is clearly a characteristic of a dishonest public servant.

Florence Pagano USCA 1 ACE, Legal Affairs I have alleged Chief Judge Lynchs
signature on the May 18, 2011 judicial misconduct order from this office to be a forgery and unquestionable identity theft. The document is in the record. Mail Fraud she mailed or caused the fraudulent document to be mailed to my Washington address. Racketeering, dishonest service fraud, mail fraud, obstruction of justice, conspiracy to violate rights. I have every piece of communication sent to this woman; she deliberately and with an intent to obstruct justice processed a misconduct order with blatant false statements and has purposely delayed the panel to review the first bogus order. I sent my judicial misconduct complaint to this office a full eight months before the bogus panel decision was posted on the courts web site; Pagano never mailed me the panel decision. The judicial misconduct is beyond obvious. Pagano had the most authority to set this litigation back on a legitimate tract. She was given multiple opportunities to halt the obstruction of justice and usurpation; she chose not to. I begged her to get the Writ before a judge and showed her the dockets that clearly indicated continued fraud and usurpation had kept my fee filed Writ from a judge; I told her if I had to appeal that I would have to pay and that this would again affect my ability to eat properly. She went ahead and took her four day holiday weekend and did not get my Writ before a judge and the subsequent bogus panel order followed. The woman does not even have a license to practice law; she has no problem making false statements, misrepresenting facts and forging a judges name on the bogus misconduct orders she drafts because she has a cushy tax payer supported position with no active law license to loose. Massachusetts law defines her position as the practice of law and she just recently posted another of her bogus misconduct orders and placed her initials next to Judge Torruellas name instead of blatant forgery which would have been hard to pull off since Judge Torruellas is in San Juan, PR, but clearly she is drafting judicial decisions without a law license and signing the Chief Judges name. http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/?content=judmisfiles.php&dt=2012

WILL THE REAL CHIEF JUDGE LYNCH PLEASE STAND UP!!!

Massachusetts Defines the practice of law: Massachusetts Conveyancers Ass'n, Inc. v. Colonial Title & Escrow, Inc., 2001 WL 669280 (Mass.Super. 2001) Whether a particular activity constitutes the practice of law is fact specific. Matter of Shoe Manufacturers Protective Association, 295 Mass. 369, 372 (1936). While a comprehensive definition would be impossible to frame what constitutes "the practice of law", in general, consists of: "[D]irecting and managing the enforcement of legal claims and the establishment of the legal rights of others, where it is necessary to form and to act upon opinions as to what those rights are and as to the legal methods which must be adopted to enforce them, the practice of giving or furnishing legal advice as to such rights and methods and the practice, as an occupation, of drafting documents by which such rights are created, modified, surrendered or secured ..." Id.

UPDATE PAGANO ACTIVATED HER LAW LICENSE IN MARCHhmm-I believe thats when I filed with the Supreme Court Gary Wente Circuit Executive of the first Circuit-- I called him to set things straight and
he asked if I had discussed my concerns with Pagano. As soon as I said I need to speak with someone above Pagano he stated, Then I am not going to have this conversation; have a good afternoon and hung up. Aiding and abetting the obstruction of justice and conspiracy to violate rights. Interestingly the day before my motion to vacate VOID, not voidable, but VOID orders was denied his name came up on my Scribd site as a term searched in Google which brought up a document with his name in it.

Susan Goldberg USCA1 Deputy Circuit Executive-Unresponsive to the fact that my WRIT
was paid for and kept from a judge. Aids and abets her federal colleagues in federal crimes.

Leslee Nelson-

USCA1 Circuit Executive Office Ignored the evidence that my writ never

saw a judge; she is an attorney in the Circuit Executive office. On a day Pagano was out of the office, I emailed Nelson the history of what was going on and I requested that she get my Writ to a judge. Professional misconduct aids and abets her federal colleagues in federal crimes.

Magistrate Judge Sorokin--USDC knowingly concurs in using any such forged or

counterfeit signature or seal. Racketeering, dishonest service fraud mail fraud, obstruction of justice, conspiracy to violate rights, identity theft, extortion and professional misconduct. He caused to be mailed the bogus order following the bogus scheduling conference of which he had no authority to convene where he without authority continued a restriction on my filing with court (Dkt. 67 & 68 docketed twice same document). He approved to falsely find me in contempt and dismiss my case with prejudice. Extortion through continual threats of sanctions and an unwarranted contempt recommendation that he, not only, had no authority make because he had no jurisdiction over the matter but he also approved of the forged name of a US District Judge on Dkt. # 86 that adopted a bogus report and recommendations of which by his approval he was the undersigned while having no legal jurisdiction of the case. He block my filings from a US District Judge. The bogus dismissal of my complaint was scanned to mask the properties of the PDF; all of the aforementioned was carried to stifle my evidence supported documentation of the crimes they were committing as public servants of the judiciary and attorney misconduct by the corrupt Jackson Lewis attorneys. Perjuryhe sat on the bench at the scheduling conference and lied through his teeth stating he had approved of Dkt. #61 which was a denial of my contempt motionorders he had no authority to write but apparently the ghost writing defense attorneys and Morse did not know the limitation of the Magistrates

authority 28 USC 636(b) when they constructed the document. He also approved being the undersigned of multiple false documents from this court in order to cover up criminal contempt and fraud upon the court by court staff and outside counsel. In my opinion he should be charged with criminal contempt among other federal crimes. The PDF with the order that dismissed my case came from his judicial assistants computer as a scanned PDF at his direction; Dkt. #86 was perjury, forgery, identity theft and continued usurpation. Magistrate Judge Sorokin has since attempted to cover up the fact that this scanned document came from his authority. See my affidavit which is exhibit one to Dkt. #100. This will show you the most bizarre happenings while Judge OToole was away from court Magistrate Sorokin wrote a 33 page opinion and signed Judge OTooles name. The opinion of this long standing RICO case came from his judicial assistants computer as a scanned PDF. An apparent after thought set the opinion with publisher information. Watch the last page 33 of the opinion jump to page 41 with the start of the publisher information. A scanned opinion is of no use to anyone except maybe the defendant it concerned. It will be interesting to watch the happenings on this case over at the appeals court. Both the USA and the defendant have appealed. You see the same day the 33 page document was constructed another PDF was filed with the properties of Judge OTooles computer but named George OToole as the author; however, the document was not from Judge OToole because no legitimate document filed by him has any named author in the properties of the PDF. This short opinion denied a motion for acquittal and was not posted on All recent opinions. Surely now a bogus appeals court decision will follow or the attorney the convicted criminal who happens to be one minute walking distance from the Jackson Lewis office can rake in more money with the new trial that Sorokin approved.

Maria Simeone USDC court room/ docket clerk to Magistrate Judge Sorokin-multiple
false documents were constructed on and filed from her computer-if she is a sworn clerk perjuryobstruction of justice and conspiracy to violate rights

James Chernetsky USDC Attorney and judicial assistant to Magistrate Sorokinhe or

Morse wrote the dismissal with prejudice Dkt. # 86 and scanned the document on Chernetskys computer to mask that the PDF did not come from Judge OToole. He also wiped out my discovery request denying me any due process. I doubt he is swornmore specifically hired to commit fraud upon the court at Magistrate Judge Sorokins direction. Professional misconduct, obstruction of justice, conspiracy to violate rights, identity theft and mail fraud. I believe he mailed Dkt. # 68 to me; he and Simone both filed #67 & #68 (same document) which continued my restriction on filing with the courtSorokin did not have jurisdiction or the authority, by law, to convene a scheduling conferencethey both knew this and I have an email that I sent Simone before the scheduling conference where I clearly stated the fact that Sorokin had no jurisdiction to convene the scheduling conference or make orders (I was restricted from filing at

the time and received no response to my email). There was never any valid order that restricted my filing with the court. Interestingly one day before Wentes name came up on my Scribd site Chernetskys name came up as a term searched in Google which brought up my Scribd documents. Both names, Wente and Chernetsky, were entered for in document searches on my Scribd site.

Christopher Danieli- USDC Docket Clerk for Judge OToole -He does not have the
authority to sign in the signature block as Deputy ClerkHe did this on the summons for the Corporation and on the final Judgment Dkt. # 87. He does not have the authority to enter a contempt motion and refer it to the Magistrate Dkt. #58. If it is proven that he does in fact have an oath on record then change the charge to perjury. Racketeering, mail fraud, obstruction of justice, conspiracy to violate rights and identity theft. He assisted switching files in the EF system.

Sarah Allison Thornton

USDC Clerk of the Court Racketeering, mail fraud,

obstruction of justice, conspiracy to violate rights, perjury (she was made aware the case was under usurpation and allowed the continuing filing of false documentsshe is a sworn public servant). Extortion when she was informed of the usurpation and criminal activity occurring in the court via email. Instead of correction, Thornton via the US Marshal mailed me a certified letter threatening me with criminal charges if I emailed any clerk in the court again.

Jeanette Ramos- USDC INTAKE/CUSTOMER SERVICE (Appeals) Certified false records

to the US Court of Appeals perjury, obstruction of justice, conspiracy to violate rights, & racketeering.

Michael Cataldo- USDC INTAKE/CUSTOMER SERVICE interference with certified mail.

His name was on the return receipts as the accepting agent for certified mail to Chief Judge Wolf, Judge OToole and Thornton. The certified mail was service of my extraordinary writ filed with the US Court of appeals. I allege at the direction of the Clerk of the Court he blocked this certified mail from the two judges. I find it peculiar that when I called to ask him what he did with the Writs after he accepted the mail as soon as I stated my name he stated, Laura McGarry from Washington. It seems they have a rather high volume of people that they deal with and his knowing my name was bizarrehe never made any statement indicating that the certified mail he accepted on the behalf of the addressees went into the hand of any addressee. He stated he gave packages to the clerks.

Daniel Hohler-

USDC Deputy Clerk to Chief judge Wolf. Obstruction of justice and

conspiracy to violate rights. He refused to put me through to the chief judge so that I could report what was going on. He and the docket clerk Kathleen

Boyce held onto an ex

parte contempt motion that was brought to the court by a process server for three months and only finally presented it to Chief Judge Wolf after I had called asking if the Chief Judge had received the Writ that came by certified mail. Most peculiarly directly after my call about the Writ my motion appeared on the docket at Dkt. #85 with a notation on the document by Chief Judge Wolf referring it to Judge OToole because it was OTooles case. I allege that the clerks simply presented this motion to Chief Judge Wolf as a misfiled motion addressed to the wrong judge; if I am wrong in the previous assumption then Chief Judge Wolf is a fraud and just as corrupt as the others named in these allegations. Danieli then blocked the motion from Judge OToole. My evidence to support this statement is in the record. Interestingly Boyce no longer works for Chief Judge Wolfperhaps she retired.

Dianne Croke- USDC judicial assistant to Judge OTooleInterference with service of

processshe accepted my mandamus which was the language of the mandamus with a notice of intent to file on behalf of Judge OToole. I received no response what so ever regarding my mandamus and I allege she never gave it to judge OToole.

Matthew Dumas Boston US Marshal

His actions were not discretionary. Court staff are not exempt from law. He joined the conspiracy to obstruct justice and violate my rights. Under the direction of Sarah Allison Thornton this US Marshal sent me a certified letter threatening to charge me with criminal State & Federal harassment charges because I had communicated to clerk staff and the Clerk of the Court with email. He was called and briefed to the fact that I did not have a phone and that I had communicated in absolutely every way possible including through all appropriate court process to end the usurpation and as the supervisor of Barbara Morse, Christopher Danieli and other clerk staff my emails to the Clerk of the Court were appropriate. He maintained that I was not allowed to email any of the clerk staff again. I emailed him where to look in the record and described multiple Title 18 evidence supported criminal violations and how these court staff and defense attorneys were in collusion and usurping the case. My communication at home in Washington is through email and SkypeI do not have a phone. I live in housing for the elderly and disabled and did not have internet but at times was lucky enough to pick up a wireless signal. This US Marshal should have immediately determined that Thornton was violating my rights under the color law and that her threat of criminal charges constituted extortion. I am a law abiding disabled American and taxed paid criminals were

protected over me. He did nothing to protect the integrity of the US District Judge where bizarre and unconstitutional rulings were being dispensed in his name in favor of filings by corrupt attorneys with well documented professional misconduct. I have the certified letter and my email communications with this Marshal and the Clerk of the Court on PDF files on my computer; they are also filed as exhibits in my case.

Jonathan Lemay Boston US Marshal The emails to Dumas were forwarded by Dumas to
Lemay they described significant Title 18 criminal violations with supporting evidenceI assume Lemay is Dumas supervisor --still nothing was done to end the usurpation, halt violation of my rights or protect the integrity of the US District Judge. Read Dkt. #27 , 52, 43, 45, 46, 52, 58, 64 exhibit 1, 69, 70,

Jackson Lewis, LLP

Conspiracy to violate rights, obstruction of justice and Racketeering all three attorneys 10/07/2011 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 47 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Robert J. Bonsignore terminated. However, "[t]he law in Massachusetts is clear. [C]orporations must appear and be represented in court, if at all, by attorneys. Driscoll v. T.R. White Co., Inc., 441 Mass. 1009, 1010 (2004), quoting Varney Enters, Inc. v. WMF, Inc., 402 Mass. 79, 82 (1998). Evergreen has 30 days to engage new counsel. Current counsel is responsible to promptly convey this Order to Evergreen. (Zierk, Marsha) (Entered: 10/07/2011)

These attorneys never made an appearance in this case and they represent a corporation. I am quite sure Judge Stearns would also be interested to see what Guy P. Tully did with the authority he established in the Kaufmann case regarding defenses. Guy P. Tully is an insult to each and every individual in the law profession!!! See Fraud upon the US District Court of Massachusetts http://goo.gl/qJXiD

Guy P. Tully- multiple acts of fraud upon the court and professional misconduct. Switched
scanned PDF files that the law firm entered into the ECF System on November 5, 2010 with word processed PDF's by engaging the assistance of Docket Clerk, Christopher Danieli, on December 3, 2010 which was four days after I filed for sanctions. Racketeering promoted by the general court order that states indigent Plaintiffs in actions against current or former employees are not entitled to the pro bono program; I allege that they encourage their clients to retaliate so that if court action ensues they will not be up against an attorney. The general court order is a violation of legislative authority. Allegation supported by evidence in the record see Dkt. #52. This corrupt attorney also ensured certification that any appeal would be

frivolous so that I could not claim in forma pauperis status in the court of appeals which guaranteed that I would remain without attorney representation.

Brian M. Childs --Corrupt attorney in training Professional Misconduct multiple acts of

fraud upon the court and the court record clearly documents their criminal acts in their bogus filings to the court.

Patrick Egan -

Mail fraud- sends out antagonistic letters across state lines with

purposeful false statements to ensure suits will be filed; he also used the US Mail to send the Defendants fraudulent EEOC position statement to my home as he initiated his plan to violate my constitutional rights by involving tax paid public servants in a planned conspiracy. False Statements (18 U.S.C. 1001) and false records submitted to a federal agency during an investigation. Hand delivered the Defendants position statement to the EEOC just days after Defendant Webster bought a house for which she paid mostly cash that remained vacantshe also listed this vacant house as the address for the registered agent on their SOC annual business report. UPDATEeven though I pointed out their restructuring in my motion that Morse denied with her first fraudulent court document #20 Defendants did in fact restructure so the annual business report is no longer filed with the SOC under Geriatric Facilitiesannual report is now filed under Pleasant Bay Nursing Center, LP and Zuckerman is now the registered Agent. All these documents are in the case recordsee the exhibit list under document 18it points to the exhibits better than Dkt. #15 and the exhibits associated with Dkt. #19. Reading the Complaint with Document #29 against the bogus answer submitted by the Defendants will show you just how corrupt this court is even before the totality of the ruse is carried.

EEOC Personnel Dishonest service fraud, mail fraud, obstruction of justice, conspiracy
to violate rights, racketeering denial of due process and violation of multiple Constitutional Rights--see paragraph 186 of dkt. # 129 All three ignored the fact that there was not one shred of evidence to support any statement by the Defendants and that my evidence proved the Defendants beyond any doubt to be in violation of the ADA; sadly they pulled this ruse during the 20th anniversary of the ADA.

Robert Sanders Director Boston Office EEOC

Mailed me a letter stating he forwarded

my FOIA request NY with intent a purposeful intent to delay the processing of the FOIA by submitting the wrong case number. Sanders denied reconsideration after he was presented with evidence that a false record and false statements were submitted to the EEOC by the Defendants. He refused to correct the deficient FOIA record and did not even respond to the request that was both emailed and faxed to him.

Kenneth AN Boston Office Purposefully ignored established EEOC policy and procedure
AND LAW.

Linda Ingle Investigator Boston Office Purposefully ignored established EEOC policy and
procedure AND LAW. Beyond her authority, as determined by legislative statute, she signed the bogus EEOC determination letter.

Robert Unitas Washington DC EEOC Field Officehe was fully aware of what was going
on with the EEOC investigation and he did nothing to halt the behavior of corrupt public servants under his watch and he took no action to ensure that the ongoing violation my constitutional rights and civil rights be immediately ceased .

The Defendants The DefendantsAll I have to say here is that you must keep an eye on your loved one if
placed in the care of these alleged criminals at Pleasant Bay Nursing & Rehabilitation Center in Brewster Massachusetts. The grand jury and law enforcement need to have a sit down with these three; they seem to think money alone exonerates them from any violation of federal crime. They are not the most honest threesome you will ever run across and they care for one of Americas most vulnerable demographics with federal and state funds. Roxanne Webster is on the Massachusetts Board of Nursing Home Administrators this was her avenue to blacklist me from employment. They believed hiring corrupt attorneys would solve all their problems. Mediation could have occurred back in 2009 and everyone could have moved on with their lives. Ask these three if crime pays??

Geriatric facilities of cape Cod, Inc.

Pleasant Bay Nursing Center, LP Pleasant Bay Health & Living Center Pleasant Bay Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Roxanne Webster Director of Operations Joshua Zuckerman Administrator Renee Mikita- left town November of 2010-now lives in North Conway N.H.

John Doe duty officer FBI Wednesday 9/21/2011 1:12 PM obstruction of

justice not to mention dereliction of professional responsibility. He refused to let me update my complaint over the phone; interestingly the FBI had been quite cordial until this call which followed the AUSA no misconduct decision.

John Doe FBI who would not process my email complaint on September 21, 2011 He wrote back that the FBI does not accepts attachmentsper the
FBI in seven other major cities the FBI accepts attachments from the public through the FBI email address set up for the public to email them complaints. Interestingly my last few filings with the court describe how I am unable to copy or scan because I am 3,000 miles away from home with just my lap top. I also have no transportation to get to and from the post office or to an agent that could copy papers for me; I was informed in the email I received from the FBI that to make a complaint with the FBI I would have to mail the complaint into Boston. I received no response from the Boston FBI when I emailed back and questioned how they would be complying with the Presidents April 27, 2011 Executive Order--Streamlining Service Delivery and Improving Customer Service; an update to Executive Order 12862. Obstruction of Justice, aiding and abetting not to mention dereliction of professional responsibility. Heres a surpriseMartha Coakleyobstruction of justice, aiding and abettingrefused to investigate my complaint; her criminal duty officer is one of the most worthless taxed paid public servants out there. During the entire time I tried to report the criminal activity coming from the court that involved obstruction of justice including switching files in the ECF System and significant violation of my rights by a planned conspiracy, he kept interrupting me to tell me he had to get off the phone because he had other calls he had to take. He mailed to my Washington address their denial in taking any action on my complaint; I specifically requested that further communication from their office be sent to me by email or to call because quite obviously being in Massachusetts I was not getting my mail that was being sent to Washington (I gave him my email address and phone number). His dereliction of duty and general lack of service is topped only by the public servants who are on Senator Browns worthless staff. Coakleys office also completely ignored the evidence I sent to their civil rights team that more than indicated a conspiracy to violate my rights with significant attorney misconduct and a fake litigation underway.

FILE CONTENT (1) If you want the filesCONTACT ME!!!

Identify computer user staff or judgecheck PDF properties on all documents

from the court no matter the form in which you receive court documents checking PDF

properties is possible. SIGN UP FOR PACER AND DOWNLOAD YOUR DOCUMENTS!!!! Right click your mouse while hovering over the opened PDF. Scanned documents are not acceptable unless they have a hand written signature; you will not be able to copy and paste or search the document if it is scanned. Learn the PDF properties of documents created by the judge assigned to your case by checking the properties of several known legitimate opinions. NEVER involve yourself in a suit in the federal court system unless you have established access to PACER where you can check the documents. The courts give you one free look when you receive a NEF (notice of electronic filing) via email; that is if you are allowed to use the electronic filing system (they prefer to keep you from accessing this system because it is easier to trash your case if you file on paper)I was not able to download any of the free looks that came from the US District Court but I could easily download them when they came from the court of appeals; I had to print, copy and paste or snap shot my free looks. MAKE SURE PAPER DOCUMENTS YOU FILE SHOW IN PACER!!! You must immediately upon receipt of any document filed in your court case download it from PACER. Any corrupt employee of the judiciary who has access to the electronic filing system can type [/s/ Judges name] and enter a document into the electronic system giving the document a legitimate appearance. Check your docket frequently and download copies of it. Keep all direct downloads of your docket on your computer even after you make your PDF or put them in a XPS document (PRINT) for printing later so they are evidence worthy. My case NO. 10 CA 11343 GAO has had zero legitimate court process; it is under usurpation (simply putthey who have no power to make decisions have been filing bogus documents with the signatures of /s/George A. OToole, Jr. or /s/ Leo T. Sorokin and filing these documents as legitimate court recordsthey are not legitimate). Magistrate Judge Sorokin was made aware that this was going on and he is corrupt; after I exposed the ruse of pretense litigation and attorney misconduct, both, evidence supported in my filings to the court and throughout the case record which shows unquestionable bogus filings by the defense and the corrupt pro se staff attorney, Magistrate Judge Sorokin with absolutely no legal jurisdiction over the matter continued to hold the case hostage on his docket and block the case from a US District Judge to effectuate continued pretense litigation. The Circuit Executive Office of the First Circuit is aware of the corruption going on and they are just as corrupt; they delayed a decision regarding obvious, well documented, judicial misconduct for eight months. I continually asked the circuit executive office to expedite the misconduct complaint and for the judicial panel to refer to my Extraordinary Writ which included all the points I made regarding judicial misconduct. Florence Pagano who processed the judicial misconduct complaint knew very well that the first order regarding my judicial complaint was bogus; she knew that my Writ filed before the case was dismissed was blocked from a judge. The joke is she processed the complaint for the first bogus order and she also processed the petition process. I think lawyers in a most delusional state think they are the only intelligent life on the planet. November 19, 2011 the panel decision came and it was just as bogus as the first order. All our judges are corrupt or Pagano alters and misrepresents

what you present regarding misconduct to the panel members; I believe that the Circuit Executive Office is the problem. Quite possibly the Judges do not even bother to look at what Pagano sends them if the misconduct complaint is by a pro se litigant. There seems to be many misconduct complaints by pro se litigants. The appeals court corrupt staff in collusion with the corrupt civil defense attorneys stole my $450.00 filing fee and blocked my Extraordinary Writ that I filed on June 10 th from a judge; the Writ was denied without an opinionby law if denied the writ had to have an opinion. The docket was entered eight days (June 28th) after the Writ was DENIED (June 20th); one of the corrupt defense attorneys made an unnecessary appearance in the already decided case at the appeals court on June 28th so the corrupt staff of the appeals court could slide in docket text stating there was a June 13th panel assignment that was not on the docket June 20th. My case in the US District Court was dismissed with prejudice on that very day (June 28, 2011). The Clerk of the Court, Sarah Allison Thornton, is corrupt; in fact, it appears Thornton hires court staff with an assigned duty to commit fraud upon the court. The US District Court of Massachusetts is a racketeering enterprise. It is still up in the air if Judge OToole is also corrupt; the latest activity executed to cover up the corruption is more and more pointing that he may very well be corrupt. My post dismissal filings further exposed the corruption. Emergency motions requesting a prompt decision were ignored; I needed a decision as I was still in Massachusetts and thought surely any honest Judge is going to call for a hearing regarding the improprieties that have had occurred in this action. I first came to Massachusetts on May 7 th because my father had requested that I come and help him get out of a nursing home that he was currently in as soon as possible; my father died on May 12th. My son then became very ill and hospitalized in Massachusetts; I explained in my motions that I needed to take him home to Washington with me to follow up on his healthcare needs as soon as possible. In spite of several calls to Paul Lyness, Deputy Clerk, no decision came forth; instead the corrupt began to cover their tracts. Two months after my emergency motion remained unanswered I filed another motion and a second affidavit that exposed their cover up attempt; I then promptly received a bogus document from the court that named me as a vexatious litigant, barred me from filing with the court, terminated my ECF System access and stated any appeal would be certified as frivolous. Much to my surprise (LOL) I did not receive the hand signature of a US District Court Judge that I had requested on that last decision from the court [clarification I mean the last decision from the corrupt; certainly not the last decision from a court]. Somehow they missed addressing my requests for judicial notice just as they missed judicial notice in the caption of my objection to their bogus R & R that fraudulently stated I was in contempt; I was shocked (note sarcasm) that the court would miss such an important request that would surely ensure due process but then I remembered I was not dealing with a court; I was dealing with the corrupt.

The corrupt attempted to continue covering their tracts even after the last bogus document that denied reconsideration and all my post dismissal motions; only this time, instead of the appearance of a deal with a convicted criminals attorney the appearance of a deal with a US Attorney or his attorney surfaced. The US Attorneys case was under a three judge panel review and the decision has lingered regarding what consequences he would face for alleged professional misconduct (according to Chief Judge Wolf as indicated by the mainstream media such as the Boston Globe the allegations of serious misconduct were well supported). Interesting that the corrupt chose to cover their criminal activity with a RICO case and an attorney misconduct case since these are the very same allegations I am making against them. Could it be that some of those in the legal profession here in Massachusetts have been reading my Scribd Site; say its not so because that would really show the level of disease within the profession since not one attorney has offered to help me. Its also amazing that when I talk to any attorney he or she declines to help in one sleazy fashion or another as soon as they hear the level of corruption involved. I did have the pleasure of speaking with one honest attorney who declined to help in an upfront manner as he with frank honesty simply stated, I cant get involved in that but I wish you the best of luck. Is the legal profession here in Massachusetts using the context of my Scribd documents as bargaining bullets for their current clients down at the corrupt court house? I believe the first case has the appearance of legal blackmail against Magistrate Sorokin or a favor for an attorney that just happens to be one minute walking distance from the Jackson Lewis office where he could now make more money by getting his client a new trial. I believe the second case has the appearance of the corrupt court staff ensuring no help comes to me from the DOJ and it also appears that since this AUSA was prosecuting a TERRORIST case in front of Judge OToole that he really wanted to win as winning a prosecution against an alleged terrorist would surely polish up his tarnished reputation. Hmmm! Could a few favors regarding motion decisions for what would occur in front of the jury have actually happennonevernonot in America!!!! http://www.livestream.com/lawlessamerica/video?clipId=flv_03d7caba-a6a4-4030-bd2f4c246fdd23dc&utm_source=lslibrary&utm_medium=ui-thumb Highly recommended lawlessamerica.com -> William Windsor has a goal to end government corruption before he dieshe thinks he has about 28 years to get the job donecould we please speed things upI dont have as long as Bill!!!!

THESE PUBLIC SERVANTS AND CIVIL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS ARE ALLEGED CRIMINALS AND THEY NEED AN APPEARANCE BEFORE A GRAND JURY THE DOJ CERTAINLY NEEDS A PROMPT OPR CHECK UP AND MORE THAN ANYTHING PUBLIC ACTION DEMANDING THE AFOREMENTIONED IS REQUIRED!!!!!

NOTE TO SENATE; HONEST ATTORNEYS NEED RETALIATION PROTECTION!!!!

The public must keep a vigilant watch over the judiciary because it has been infiltrated by domestic terrorist who in collusion with corrupt attorneys have delegitimized this branch of our government; the electronic filing system promotes this corrupt activity. I allege that the staff in the circuit executive office also forge Chief Judge Lynchs hand signature on orders regarding judicial misconduct complaints; this office excels in bogus document writing regarding complaints of judicial misconduct. The circuit executive office cannot present the actual facts you present to make your case of judicial misconduct to the Chief Judge because a FAKE litigation process would be spotted by any honest judge and the game would be up; we have to have faith that the Chief judge of the US Court of Appeals of the First Circuit is an honest woman. THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND SHE DOES NOT BELONG TO THE CORRUPT WHO LIVE OFF THE HARD WORKING AMERICANS TAX DOLLAR OR ATTORNEYS WHO HAVE ABANDONDED THE PRINCIPLES BEHIND THEIR PROFESSION WE ARE TAKING AMERICA BACK!!!! Clerk staff have a duty to draft credible, dignified, and impartial judicial opinion; the opinions from the US District Court of Massachusetts are designed to throw your case if you are a pro se litigant and if your opposition is from the elite pool of corrupt attorneys who are allowed to freely break law and commit fraud upon the court your chances of success, even if you have an attorney, dwindle. This can happen even if you have an honest attorney on your side; not all attorneys are allowed to play the game. You must keep in mind the more corruption the longer the battle and if you have an attorney who is allowed in the game the profits for attorneys on both sides just keep rolling in; your attorney may be more concerned about the size of his or her bank account than your relief. IF YOU ARE PRO SE YOUR CHANCES THAT YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE VIOLATED INCREASE! If you are opposed by a corrupt law firm such as Jackson Lewis, LLP of Boston, absolutely nothing you take the time and energy to present to the court will matter. Your filings will never actually see a judge who is interested in justice!!! You were set up to lose!!!! The corrupt public servants aid and abet each other to pull off these crimes; they also aid and abet in cover up when any corruption is exposed even if they were not initially involved. They are criminals who show up to work at the house of justice to purposefully violate your rights (sometimes show up they frequently leave early and enjoy many days off beyond their schedule vacation time allowance); they enjoy a comfortable lifestyle at the expense of the tax payer. The federal judiciary is a joke and there is absolutely no prestige in being appointed a seat as a US DISTRICT Judge because the federal court system, in itself, has become a unit of domestic terrorism; if action is not promptly taken to RESTORE the INTEGRITY of our courts America will be forever gone!!!

Note to Senate & House Judiciary Committees

BLIND OVERSIGHT IS IMPOTENCE AND YOU HAVE ALLOWED OUR US COURTS TO EVOLVE INTO MOB FAMILIES

YOURE FIRED
THE TAX PAYER DOES NOT WANT TO SUPPORT YOU ANYMORE

NOTE TO LEGISLATIVE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT

WE SHOULD NOT HAVE A PSYCHIATRIC SUB CATEGORY OF POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER KNOWN AS LEGAL ABUSE SYNDROME IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MAKE LAWS THAT ENSURE ORDINARY AMERICANS THE RIGHTS TO WHICH THEY ARE ENTITLED AND ENSURE A SAFE PLACE THEY CAN BRING THEIR GRIEVANCE WHEN THOSE RIGHTS ARE VIOLATED I DEMAND IMMEDIATE LEGISLATION THAT ADDRESSES CORRUPTION IN OUR COURTS I DEMAND THAT LEGISLATION COMES WITH SENTENCING GUIDELINES THAT WOULD DETER ANYONE PREDISPOSED TO CORRUPTION FROM PULLING THIS CRAP IN ANY COURT OF THESE UNITED STATES I DEMAND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION FOR COURT EMPLOYEES I DEMAND KNOWLEDGE OF CRIME FROM WITHIN OUR COURTS LEFT UNREPORTED HAVE AS HARSH A SENTENCE AS THE CRIME ITSELF I DEMAND THAT DECISIONS PROVEN TO BE MADE UNDER THE RUSE OF DISCRETIONARY JUDGMENT BY ANY ONE WITH AUTHORITY TO MAKE DISCRETIONARY DECISIONS BE INDICTED FOR THE CRIME THEY CORRUPTLY AVOIDED PROSECUTING TITLE 18 VIOLATIONS ARE SERIOUS CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS WHY ARE THEY BEING IGNORED IF THE VICTIM IS JUST AN ORDINARY AMERICAN? PLEASE PERFORM YOUR DUTY!! Judicial power is never exercised for the purpose of giving effect to the will of the judge; always for the purpose of giving effect to the will of the legislature; or, in other words, to the will of the law." [Emphasis in original]. Littleton v. Berbling, 468 F.2d 389, 412 (7th Cir. 1972), citing Osborn v. Bank of the United States, 9 Wheat (22 U.S.) 738, 866, 6 L.Ed 204 (1824); U.S. v. Simpson, 927 F.2d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir. 1991).

CURRENT STATUS--THE WILL OF THE CORRUPT!

Massachusetts citizens are the US District Judges in the dark regarding this corrupt activity in the US District Court of Massachusetts or are they simply using the clerk staff to do their dirty work? The corrupt tactics of US District Judges in other states are well documented all over the internet? See lawlessamerica.com and search liveleak.com for the well documented exposure of corruption in the US Courts by Dr. Joseph Zernik.

GRAND JURY HEARINGS REQUIRED!!!

The Grand Jury, which does not depend on a case or controversy for power to get evidence but can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or [338 U.S. 632, 643] even just because it wants assurance that it is not.

MASSACHUSETTS CITIZENS AND CITIZENS OF THESE UNITED STATES MUST DEMAND GRAND JURY HEARINGS!!!
NOTE TO THE CORRUPT PUBLIC SERVANTS: YOU WILL NOT VIOLATE MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND MAKE DEALS WITH THE ATTORNEY OF A CONVICTED CRIMINAL THAT HAS HIS OFFICE ONE MINUTE WALKING DISTANCE FROM THE CORRUPT ATTORNEYS IN MY CASE OR WITH A US ATTORNEY ACCUSED OF MISCONDUCT TO COVER YOUR TRACTS IN MY AMERICA and the AMERICA THAT I WILL PASS TO MY CHILDREN!!

The following are examples of how to ID the Computers.

study properties.

Right click and

06-cv-11053-GAO_A PDF from all recent opinions site PDF created after entered on recent orders 06-cv-11053-GAO_B from recent orders authentic O'Toole 09-cr-10017-GAO_A PDF from all recent opinions site PDF created after entered on recent orders 09-cr-10017-GAO_B authentic O'Toole 09-cv-11608-GAO_A authentic O'Toole

09-cv-11608-GAO_B PDF from all recent opinions site PDF created after entered on recent orders 09-cv-11661-GAO_A entered by Danieli from PACER bench trial 09-cv-11661-GAO_B created 9 27 2011 time 3_46_51 from recent opinions Authentic O'Toole PDF created after entered on recent orders 9 1 11 signed by Lyness from his computer-no orders by O'Toole 9 28 2011 order by drafted by Chernetsky on his computer sorokin's assistant 10-1792 Docket SBT noted on this docket 10-cv-11484-GAO_A PDF from all recent opinions site PDF created after entered on recent orders 10-cv-11484-GAO_B authentic O'Toole 11-cv-11291 PSSA manipulates file date 11-cv-11291-GAO pssa1 creates document 9 19 2011 but dates it 9 15 2011 another alleged forged judicial misconduct order appeals court docket altered since case decided see june 13 (SBT) Chernetsky draft on his computer for sorokin_author last 4 digits of his phone no. Chernetsky drafted for sorokin 9 28 2011 default signed by deputy clerk_no scanner used entered by SBT at appeals (alleged corrupt court employ manipulates docket after decision filed) alleged forged signature on misconduct Judge Casper's clerk created PDF for order of dismissal on prisoner 9 22 2011 dates order 9 21 2011 legitimate signature of Chief Judge Lynch judicial complaint and doj contention Lyness created this and signed the US District Judge's name lyness entered 9 30 2011 o'toole order 8 9 2010 pro se staff attorney see properties adopts Sorokin's report & recommendation and undersigns Gorton R & R by Dien adopted by O'Toole not scanned year 2008 appears to be drafted by Magistrate see affidavit dkt 100 plaintiff's favor

sorokin 8.2.5 shows progression of computer updates sorokin 8.1.0 shows progression of computer updates sorokin order 2_01_2011 drafted by Maria Simeone

sorokin order 2_01_2011 drafted by Simeone on her computer sorokin order 2_01_2011drafted by Chernetsky on his computer sorokin order drafted by Chernetsky 7_10 sorokin order drafted by Simeone 6_10 sorokin order drafted Simeone 1_11 sorokin using 8.2.5 untitled 2_2011 shows progression of computer updates sorokin using 8.2.5 untitled 12_2010 shows progression of computer updates sorokin using 8.2.6 untitled 3_2011 shows progression of computer updates

FILE CONTENT (2)

Posted on all recent opinions

Reading All Recent Opinions available on the courts

web site and checking those PDF properties helps to ID the judges computer properties but you must be aware that they also make a new PDF and remove any clerk ID from the properties before they post on this site. They rarely post a bogus document on All Recent Opinions and, for the most part, opinions that originated as drafts by clerks appear to be approved by the judge and credible as far as law; however, they do not really mean ALL. Opinions drafted under usurpation or otherwise bogus will not appear on the All Recent Opinions web page. Check the quotes out that circle on the wall of the home page of US District Court of Massachusetts; this is an award winning web site. The quotes are just for show; they do not hold to any of this essentially false advertising and the court, itself, defines by example the meaning of dishonest service fraud.
06-cv-11053-GAO note correct page number sequence for publisher information not scanned 09-cv-10293-GAO_A created 9 28 2011 entered by Danieli 09-cv-10293-GAO_B created 9 28 2011 time 4_39_43 PM from all recent opinions PDF from all recent opinions site PDF created after entered on recent orders Authentic O'Toole

09-cv-11245-GAO_A 9 28 11 time 2_19_45 PM properties_ title_memorandum clerk draft 09-cv-11245-GAO_B 9 28 11 time 2_59_13 PM from recent opinions memorandum removed new PDF from O'Toole's computer 10-cv-10477-GAO_A 9 30 2011 time 2_38_05 PM properties author_Brett Lovins 10-cv-10477-GAO_B 9 30 2011 time 2_50_39 PM from all recent opinions author removed new PDF from O'Tooles computer 10-cv-10661-GAO_A properties_author_io'toole 10-cv-10661-GAO_B PDF from all recent opinions site PDF created after entered on recent orders 10-cv-10829-GAO_A PDF from all recent opinions site PDF created after entered on recent orders 10-cv-10829-GAO_B properties_author_io'toole 10-cv-11439-GAO_A properties_author_io'toole created 9 27 2011 10_34_38 AM ordered entered time 10_51_45 by Danieli 10-cv-11439-GAO_B created 9 27 2011 time 10_53_43 from recent opinions 10-cv-12128-GAO PDF from all recent opinions site PDF created after entered on recent orders author removed 10-cv-12128-GAO properties_author_ io'toole posted on recent opinions District of Massachusetts Opinions 10_3_2011 AM Dkt 19 10-cv-12128-GAO_A author io'toole 9 29 2011 time 11_31_17 AM Dkt 19 10-cv-12128-GAO_B properties changed for recent opinions post 9 29 2011 time 12_01_12 author removed w_new PDF from O'Tooles computer

FILE CONTENT (3)

Not on all recent opinions apparently means you were denied due process
and received zero US District Judge oversight of rogue court staff. In my case a scanned document was entered into the ECF System by corrupt court staff where they forged the US District Judges name and illegally dismissed my complaint WITH PREJUDICE (docket #86). The document was drafted by either an attorney named Chernetsky who is the judicial assistant to Magistrate Judge Sorokin or the rogue pro se staff attorney, Barbara Morse, but the scanned PDF was created on Chernetskys computer; Judge OTooles corrupt docket clerk, Christopher Danieli, entered and filed the document. Chernetsky has apparently been hired to commit fraud upon the court as have the pro se staff attorneys; the circuit executive office verified the latter when they found nothing out of the ordinary with Barbara Morses

bizarre rulings in my case NO. 10 CA 11343 GAO (docket 20, 53, 57, and 61 are examples of her fraudulent work); the first bogus order regarding judicial misconduct fraudulently describes how my allegations of usurpation by Morse were baseless yet her bogus documents where she without fear of consequence forged the name of a US District Judge do not even appear on the opinions docket and the docket manipulation stares back at you from the activity docket and the properties of the PDFs. See case 04-cr-10029 and case 109-mc-10206-RWZ -WGY GAO in the cover up files. First we have a RICO case conviction where post-conviction motions by the defense have lingered, in fact, the last entry on the docket in case 04-cr-10029 by court staff was in May of 2010; next, we have the long awaited decision in, 109-mc-10206-RWZ -WGY GAO, a case regarding the misconduct of an Assistant US Attorney that has also lingered showing the last docket entry by court staff back in December of 2010. Both of these cases had sudden favorable rulings entered into the ECF System with scanned PDFs created on Cherntskys computer. The first favorable ruling came after I let the corrupt Deputy Clerk, Paul Lyness, know I was well aware of their ruse and that I knew no US District Judge had seen any part of my case; he was informed that I knew the exact computer from which they created the scanned forged document in my dismissal. Case NO. 10 CA 11343 GAO (docket 100 exhibit 1*) is my affidavit describing the corrupt public servants then feeble attempt at a cover up in hopes of making scanned documents appear legitimate using case 04-cr-10029; the appearance of some very unethical deal making is also present with this attempted cover-up. The Administrative Rules regarding filings into the ECF System by, both, the US District Court and USCA 1 prohibit scanned documents unless scanning is the only option in presenting the document; word processed files (Native PDF) are preferred for their smaller size, copy and paste, as well as, search capabilities; a legitimate document created into a scanned PDF by court staff for entry into the ECF System occurs when a hand written signature of a judge or a clerk is placed on the document. Shortly after the corrupt read the aforementioned affidavit a favorable final decision came in the lingering case 109-mc-10206-RWZ -WGY GAO which did require scanning because it was hand signed but it certainly did not have to travel to Chernetskys computer to create the scanned PDF when Lyness, Deputy Clerk, and Danieli, Docket Clerk, have perfectly fine up to date scanning capabilities on their very own work computers. ( see file scanned and hand signed)
08-cv-10388-GAO 9/30/2011 scanned on Chernetsky's computered then Danieli entered states filed 9/23/2011 adopted R & R not O'Toole's signature 08-cv-11782-GAO 9/28/2011 scanned Chernetsky's computer entered by Danieli Dein R & R adopted allege they scanned this just to show another magistrates name on these scanned documents and on a case that was proceeding to trial. This PDF probably should be in the cover up file. 09-11841-GAO 9/30/2011 properties_author_George O'Toole created OToole does not put his name in the properties 9/30/2011 entered by Lyness not on recent opinions

09-cv-11972-GAO_A 6 17 2011 Maria Simeone clerk to Magistrate Sorokin wrote r & r 09-cv-11972-GAO_B scanned by Chernetsky 9/22/ 2011 time 4:48:10 entered 9/23/2011 time 09:47:05 sorokins clerk wrote R & R then they scanned the adoption supposedly by OToole but written the clerk or Chernetsky 10-cv-11253-GAO this is the only time Lyness entered an order in this case which was done to cover up the scanning ruse Danieli is on the on docket 105 times 10-cv-11253-GAO scanned on Chernetsky's computer entered by lyness 10-cv-12121-GAO 9 29 2011 properties aberration_author_George O'Toole entered by Danieli not on recent opinions 11-cv-10254-GAO properties_author George O'Toole signature variant Lyness entered

R & R* r & r* Report and Recommendation. Unless you have signed consent to be under the jurisdiction of the magistrate he or she cannot write orders on motions that will change the course of your case; he or she can only write a report and recommendation and that R & R is a direct request from the US District Judge to the Magistrate after an opposition to the motion at hand is filed or the due date for opposition passes. A US District Judge then decides if he or she will adopt the report and recommendation by the magistrate after he reads your objection (if any) to the R & R written by the Magistrate; the final decision by law comes from a US District Judge. My case never saw an US District Judge and was held hostage by the Magistrate because of all the criminal activity by court staff and corrupt civil defense attorneys I had documented in my filings to the court; the constitution does not count nor does proper documented court procedure apply if corrupt attorneys and corrupt public servants require protection. My complaint should have been resolved at the EEOC but the corrupt attorneys have the EEOC in their pocket as well or is it the corrupt attorneys put things in the EEOCs pocket? Strange that one of the Defendants bought a $638,800.00 house that remained vacant six days before one of Jackson Lewis corrupt attorneys hand delivered their position statement to the EEOC; she took only $260,000.00 out in mortgage. I was then ignored by the EEOC for over eight months and with overwhelming evidence and the law on my side the EEOC failed to make a finding. The defendants submitted nothing that supported their position to the EEOC they only submitted false statements and false documents and not even their false documents supported their position.

The court has a general order that indigent litigants in cases against former or current employers are not entitled to the pro bono program. The defendants and the corrupt

attorneys make sure that through retaliation you become indigent.

CAN YOU SAY

RACKETEERING??
The law says the court may appoint an attorney for any indigent litigant!!! OH yes, the general court order is endorsed by typing in the judges names (not even /s/ name which also means nothing because the rogue court staff type /s/Judges Name and enter bogus documents all the time but the general order simply has the Judges names typed on the document. These people are freaking lawyers???? Give me a break!!!!!

NOTE TO US DISTRICT JUDGES REGARDING YOUR COURT FAMILY---KEEP A CLOSER EYE ON YOUR KIDS!!!!
Oh yes, NOTE to corrupt lawyers and corrupt public servants: your game is not that hard to figure out and is not even close to the complexity of situations I have had to deal with in my profession. I know how to read! YOU ARE CORRUPT CRIMINAL MORONS!!! (alleged criminals, of course, but the moron part does not require the alleged qualifier and you have, in fact, proven that you are morons) Why would you want to destroy the integrity your very own countrys justice system? *See Reading "Cover-Up of Corruption and Violation of Constitutional Ri..." on Scribd http://www.scribd.com/doc/64299428 May explain the unresponsive FBI and DOJ see the update page 22!! FILE CONTENT (4)

Scanned PDF documents created on the docket or deputy clerks computer and hand signed by judge or clerk Check out the properties of these
mostly legitimate court documents. Pay attention to documents that show Judge OTooles signature which are from computers where scanned PDFs have been created by Danieli and Lyness (the exception would be the Chernetsky computer scanned PDF with the decision regarding the Assistant US Attorney (good to have a little DOJ in your pocket when you have been violating federal laws). Simeone is Magistrate Sorokins docket clerk and she scans legitimate documents unlike the clerk, Chernetsky, who they hide behind the curtain. Chernetskys computer is used to scan documents when they want to deny you justice or cover up their criminal behavior after confronted. (See not posted on all recent opinions and cover up files)
01-cv-12257 scanned entered 9 19 2011 by clerk young signed r & r 9 17 2011

06-cr-10337 scanned_entered by Danieli 4 10 2008 signed by o'toole 4 08 2008 08-cv-10051 scanned_entered 9 27 2011 wolf signs 9 26 2011 adopted R & R 08-cv-10730-GAO 9 6 2011 scanned 1_00_34 PM entered 13_06_06 by lyness

09-10166 opinion with wolf's signature 3 7 2011 09-cv-10166 scanned_entered 3 16 2011 signed by wolf M & O 09-cv-10237 scanned_entered 1 05 2011 st re_sorokins R & R 09-cv-10287 scanned_entered 8 5 2011 gorton default judgement signed 10-cr-10118 scanned_entered by Danieli signs in deputy clerk block 10-cv-10443 scanned by Lyness 9_22_11 O'Toole signed 9 21 2011 10-cv-10699 adopted R & R by sorokin scanned 9 27 2011 entered 9 28 2011 10-cv-11009 scanned_entered 9 28 2011 Gorton adopting R & R 10-cv-11767 signed_scanned_entered by danieli signs in deputy clerk block 10-cv-12114 scanned 3_07_48 entered 15_57 12 danieli signs deputy clerk 10-cv-12143 scanned entered 9 27 2011 filed 9 26 adopted R & R 11-cv-10018 scanned_entered by Lyness 9 6 2011 11-cv-10028 scanned filed by lyness time 9_38_12 AM 9 16 2011 filed 9 15 2011 11-cv-10092 scanned time 2_56_47 entered time 15_16_09 gorton R & R 9 16 2011 11-cv-10496 Lyness scanned 10_05_49 entered 10_14_12 conf 9_19_2011 11-cv-10563 scanned Danieli's computer signed by OToole 11-mc-91118 scanned_entered Simeone's computer signed 6 13 2011 sorokin order 11-mc-91216 scanned_entered by Simeone signed by sorokin 9 26 2011 11-mj-06025 scanned_entered by Simeone signed by sorokin 8_25_11

FILE CONTENTS (5-parts 1 &2)

Cover up attempts and appearance of deals made regarding a RICO case and the
infamous Assistant US Attorneys case. Keep in mind the clerk staff control that docket!!! This is good reading if you have the time. (two files required)

1/20/2012 UPDATE-BARBARA MORSE IS NOW USING A COMPUTER WITH THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIES
Title: untitled Author: Subject: Application: PDF Producer: Acrobat Distiller 8.3.1 (Windows) PDF Version: 1.4 (Acrobat 5.x) Some of the Judges computers also have these properties so check who entered the order-if she entered the document she, more than, most likely wrote the documentshe also enters documents on in forma pauperis pro se cases if the Judges assistant drafted the document. If the content of your decision is unjust look furtherbe reasonablethere could be, on rare occasion, actual legal basis for the decision but you will have to visually scrub the documents for aberrations and research law on every document that comes from this court. Example with her name actually signing off this particular document: Case 1:10-cv-11484 see docket filings 1/20/2012 ______________________________________________________________________________
04-cr-10029 created 12:22:40PM entered by danieli 13:15:16 properties_author_ George O'Toole a properties on authentic OToole ARE Blank allege OToole was not present in court 9/1/2011 04-cr-10029 District of Massachusetts ALL Recent Opinions blue dot means opinion has publisher information 04-cr-10029 full docket 04-cr-10029 publishing info jumps pg 33 to pg 41-after thought WP file already deleted-allege they doctored in the publisher info using another word process file but couldnt find one with 33 pages 04-cr-10029 recent orders 9/1/2011 no written opinions other than Carpenter RICO case which has lingered for monthsall other orders on OToole Docket Clerk orders or electronic entered by clerk 04-cr-10029 usa appealing new trial anticipate bogus ruling favoring Carpenter & USA saying no new trial or Carpenter allowed acquittal 04-cr-10029 written by Sorokin indents to t (united)scanned PDF created on Chernetsky's computer 12:59:48 PM entered by Danieli 13:32:21PM see affidavit exhibit 1 Dkt. 100 McGarrys case

04-cr-10029-GAO Docket Activity Report 9/1/2011 09-cv-11617-GAO adoption of sorokins R & R scanned 9/20/2011 on Chernetsky's computer entered by Danieli 10-11019-GAO prisoner docket Barbara Morse pssa4 orders 10-11019-GAO they now have Barbara Morse back to using courier font and an 8.2.6 computer 10-cv-11019-GAO Barbara Morse dkt #25 10-cv-11019-GAO docket 25 docket text Barbara Morse continues to manipulate file dates 11-cv-11099 O'Toole order 8/17/2011 on emergency Motion filed 8/15/2011 by an attorney- McGarrys emergency motions were ignored 11-cv-11510 see dkt activity pssa 4 Barbara Morse now using 8.2.6 & leaves her name out of properties See McGarrys case file memorandum & orders Dkt. # 9,20, 53she switched computers for #57 11-mc-91156 Danieli scanned time 11:13 AM entered by Danieli time 11:20AM Wolf signed for O'toole 8/23/2011 because O'Toole was not in the court this day 109-mc-10206-RWZ -WGY -GAO 9 15 2011 US Attorney Auerhahns case decision scanned on Chernetsky's computer on 9/15/2011 time 3:01PM entered 4:30PM by Danieli 109-mc-10206-RWZ -WGY -GAO US Attorney Auerhahns case O'Toole docket used for final order-all other orders since 3 judge panel assigned have been on Zobel docket 109-mc-10206-RWZ -WGY -GAO from all recent opinions if legitimate would be from O'Tooles computer & not scanned 1915. Proceedings in forma pauperis A document shall not be considered filed until the System generates an NEF Docket showing case assignment with docket number docket Wolf making O'Toole assignments appears O'Toole out of court 8/22/11 9/2/11 when carpenter opinion came from Sorokin on 9/1/11 Dkt. 101 McGarry case from this court has properties of computer Morse is using which are the same as Lyness computer Lyness entered the bogus opinion pro bono counsel denied employment case general court order not mentioned pssa on employment case denied attorney does not mention no pro bono attorney allowed in employment cases

the court just denies motions for attorney assistance does not mention general order denying pro bono help zobel employment case in forma pauperis denied counsel court general order not mentioned

UPDATE
Apparently the Defendant who has had his conviction vacated by Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin who undersigned Judge OToole has requested a modification to his condition of release pending the new trial; there is an appeal by the USA regarding the vacated judgment yet the motion for the Defendants request for out of country travel and any opposition by the USA does not appear on the docket with the docket jumping from #381 to #386. On 2/10/2012 an order undersigned by Judge OToole came forth allowing the Defendants motion but the order did not come from Judge OToole.
Properties of Document Author: Authorized User Created: 2/10/2012 9:43:25 AM Modified: 2/10/2012 9:43:25 AM Application: Microsoft Office Word 2007 SIGNATURE VARIANT:

See affidavit Cover-Up of Corruption http://www.scribd.com/doc/64299428 As of this writing it does not appear the court of appeals was notified of the modification of release order allowing the Defendant to apply for a new passport and out of country travel: no notice of the USDC order in case no. 11-2131 appeal by USA or case no. 11-2131 appeal by Defendant re: denial of acquittal appears on either docket. Interesting that (GK) is the case manager for these appeals.

NOTE BELOW THE MOTION SEQUENCE REGARDING THE DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF RELEASE IN 2010. This latest 2/10/12012 order did not make it onto the Written Opinions Report.

THERE ARE NO CRIMES IN MASSACHUSETTS IF THE CRIME INVOLVES ONE OF MASSACHUSETTS WELL CONNECTED LAWYERS.

I am quite sure that an actual professional honest law enforcement officer would come up with more charges. The problem lays with finding a tax paid honest law enforcement officer that actually performs his or her duty. Title 18 U.S.C. 4 ALL named parties 18 U.S.C. 505 : US Code - Section 505: Seals of courts; signatures of judges or court officers Whoever forges the signature of any judge, register, or other officer of any court of the United States, or of any Territory thereof, or forges or counterfeits the seal of any such court, or

knowingly concurs in using any such forged or counterfeit signature or seal, for the purpose of authenticating any proceeding or document, or tenders in evidence any such proceeding or document with a false or counterfeit signature of any such judge, register, or other officer, or a false or counterfeit seal of the court, subscribed or attached thereto, knowing such signature or seal to be false or counterfeit, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. . 505's plain language only requires that a defendant charged under the statute knowingly forge the signature of a federal judge "for the purpose of authenticating any proceeding or document." Although Congress did not define the term "forge" as used in 505, the term generally is defined as "[t]o fabricate, construct, or prepare one thing in imitation of another thing, with the intention of substituting the false for the genuine...." Black's Law Dictionary 650 (6th ed.1990). In this case, the alleged crime is that multiple staff prepared a court document knowing it to be false, and placed the district judge's signature thereon for the purpose of making the document appear authentic In Levinson v. United States, 47 F.2d 470, 471 (6th Cir.1931), the Sixth Circuit opined that "Congress, regardless of its intent, by the use of the verb 'forge,' limited the application of the statute, in so far as cases of intended authentication are concerned, to those in which the elements of common-law forgery enter." Because the common law crime of forgery required an intent to defraud, see generally Moskal v. United States, 498 U.S. 103, 121-128, 111 S.Ct. 461, 472-76, 112 L.Ed.2d 449 (1990) (Scalia, J., dissenting), so did 505. The subsequent decisions in United States v. Bertrand, 596 F.2d 150 (6th Cir.1979), and United States v. London, 714 F.2d 1558 (11th Cir.1983), followed Levinson 's rationale. The purpose of 505 is to protect the reputation and integrity of the federal courts, their official documents and proceedings, rather than simply to outlaw a narrow category of fraud. The statute applies whenever someone attempts to impugn this integrity by forging a federal judge's signature onto a document in order to make that document appear authentic. A forged signature on a document which the forger intends to appear authentic is the only intent requirement of 505. Our construction of 505 is true to both its text and purpose. Footnote 3---Contrary to Defendant's assertions, the Government does not take the position that the act of drawing a federal judge's signature onto a document alone is a criminal act. Such a reading of the statute would eliminate the express requirement that the forgery be made "for the purpose of authenticating" the document Defendant's deceit in forging Judge Johnson's signature jeopardized Hostetter's right to have his legal claims heard, and thus is more properly akin to an obstruction of justice. TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 47 > 1028A Aggravated identity theft United States v. Blixt, __ F.3d __, 2008 WL 5003239 (9th Cir. Nov. 26, 2008) Whether the use of anothers signature constitutes a means of identification for purposes of the Aggravated Identity Theft statute has not yet been resolved by this or any other circuit. Finding no prior authority on the issue, we hold as a matter of first impression that forging

another's signature constitutes the use of that person's name and thus qualifies as a means of identification under 18 U.S.C. 1028A. Id.

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 47 > 1018 1018. Official certificates or writings Whoever, being a public officer or other person authorized by any law of the United States to make or give a certificate or other writing, knowingly makes and delivers as true such a certificate or writing, containing any statement which he knows to be false, in a case where the punishment thereof is not elsewhere expressly provided by law, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. (this covers any docket clerk making filings in this case who is not under a sworn oaththose under oath have committed perjury). TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 73 > 1512 (see Dkt. # 51 and # 52 and sworn affidavits exhibit one at both Dkt. # 97 & #100 (EEOC see document #29 paragraph 186) this is the story in the entire record with the finale dkt. #101) Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the objects integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; ((3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. (c) Whoever corruptly (1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the objects integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or

(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. (d) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades any person from (1) attending or testifying in an official proceeding; (2) reporting to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense (3) arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in connection with a Federal offense; or or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both. (f) For the purposes of this section (1) an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense; and (2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object need not be admissible in evidence or free of a claim of privilege. (g) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, no state of mind need be proved with respect to the circumstance (1) that the official proceeding before a judge, court, magistrate judge, grand jury, or government agency is before a judge or court of the United States, a United States magistrate judge, a bankruptcy judge, a Federal grand jury, or a Federal Government agency; or (2) that the judge is a judge of the United States or that the law enforcement officer is an officer or employee of the Federal Government or a person authorized to act for or on behalf of the Federal Government or serving the Federal Government as an adviser or consultant. (k) Whoever conspires to commit any offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy. 18 U.S.C. 1346 : US Code - Section 1346: Definition of "scheme or artifice to defraud" 18 U.S.C. 1513 : US Code - Section 1513: Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant

Search 18 U.S.C. 1621 : US Code - Section 1621: Perjury generally 18 U.S.C. 872 : US Code - Section 872: Extortion by officers or employees of the United States 18 U.S.C. 876 : US Code - Section 876: Mailing threatening communications 18 U.S.C. 880 : US Code - Section 880: Receiving the proceeds of extortion 18 U.S.C. 401 : US Code - Section 401: power of the court 18 U.S.C. 1519 : US Code - Section 1519: Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy 18 U.S.C. 1506 : US Code - Section 1506: Theft or alteration of record or process;

MY Petition filed in the US Court of Appeals of the First Circuit by any legitimate reading of the WRIT was based on the Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004 ("CVRA" or "the Act"), 18 U.S.C. 3771 and unarguable usurpation. I claimed that I was a crime victim throughout my filings to the US District Court; I had Judge OToole served with an intent to file Mandamus Notice and the language of the Mandamus back in February 2011 that clearly described an active conspiracy to violate my rights and obstruct justice with a clear description of other federal criminal violations by the Defense Attorneys and public servants of the court which received no response. http://goo.gl/Q36ug I requested in my relief that I be protected from further conspiracy
when I motioned for reassignment of judicial officers; Sorokin denied the motion with docket text and terminated the motion from the docket without putting it in front of Judge OToole.

18 U.S.C. 3771. Crime victims' rights

(3) MOTION FOR RELIEF AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS.--The rights described in subsection (a) shall be asserted in the district court in which a defendant is being prosecuted for the crime or, if no prosecution is underway, in the district court in the district in which the crime occurred. The district court shall take up and decide any motion asserting a victim's right forthwith. If the district court denies the relief sought, the movant may petition the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus. The court of appeals may issue the writ on the order of a single judge pursuant to circuit rule or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The court of appeals shall take up and decide such application forthwith within 72 hours after the petition has been filed. In no event shall proceedings be stayed or subject to a continuance of more than

If the court of appeals denies the relief sought, the reasons for the denial shall be clearly stated on the record in a written opinion.
five days for purposes of enforcing this chapter.

Most interestingly when I moved to consolidate my Writ with the appeal since I knew the Writ had never passed before the eyes of a judge, Guy P. Tully argued how there was absolutely no reason to bring up the Writ again and that I should have asked for a re-hearing in a timely fashion. I filed a motion for an emergency hearing of the Writ that had never been heard and specified that my motion and Writ be heard under the provisions of the crimes victims act with a review of the case record that would reveal multiple Title 18 Criminal Violations. Both corrupt attorneys then filed second notices of appearances in the appeal case only this time they put the Defendants names on them. The attorneys never filed any notice of appearance in the US District Court Case and falsely appeared in the action where by law and court rule not one of their filings could be recognized by the court. Quite obviously when no judicial ruling came forth but only another bogus filing by the Jackson Lewis attorneys I knew they had once again colluded with court staff.

Fraud Upon the US District Court Of Massachusetts http://goo.gl/qJXiD The best courts money can buy Corrupt Jackson Lewis Attorneys Corrupt MA Fed Courts http://www.scribd.com/tired_of_corruption/d/78732389-The-best-courts-money-can-buyCorrupt-Jackson-Lewis-Attorneys-Respond-to-Applellant-s-Request-That-Court-Provide-aMandate-Regarding-Judgments-and
See objection to R & R http://goo.gl/o9XMz

See Denied without an opinion Writ

http://www.scribd.com/doc/57692690 The Extraordinary

Reading "Dishonest Service Fraud With Obstruction of Justice in th..." on Scribd http://www.scribd.com/doc/62737753 This leads to other reads. Reading "The Criminal Enterprise at the Us District Court of Massa..." The USDC docket http://www.scribd.com/doc/64869599 Shows the case docket and I note their corrupt tactics in red.

Is the Chief Judge of the First Circuit, Incompetent, A Criminal or Has Her Signature Been Forged http://goo.gl/ybhC3

Reading "Cover-Up of Corruption and Violation of Constitutional Ri..." on Scribd http://www.scribd.com/doc/64299428 May explain the unresponsive FBI and DOJ see the update page 22!! Corrupt Magistrate Leo T. Sorokin in action.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/73208009 docketing statement USCA1 http://www.scribd.com/doc/73206856 Defendants response to motions and docketing statement http://www.scribd.com/doc/72923051 my reply to the corrupt Defense Attorneys

Request to Congress for Investigation & Impeachment of MA Federal Judges including Chief Judge Wolf & Chief Judge Lynch http://www.scribd.com/doc/68924379